Shock Labour Department bill for Kouga
The Kouga Council has been confronted with a shock bill from the Department of Labour – this one dating back ten years and totalling almost R13-million.
Executive Mayor Elza van Lingen said the outstanding monies were for Return of Earnings (RoEs), required for what is commonly known as “workmen’s compensation” and payable annually by the municipality to the Compensation Commissioner at the Department of Labour.
“The Council recently made the shocking discovery that the municipality hasn’t been submitting its Return of Earnings to the Compensation Commissioner since 2007.
“This means that municipal employees have not had proper cover for Injury on Duty claims for the past ten years, putting not only staff but Council at substantial risk.”
She said the municipality owed the Department of Labour a total of R12,619 million, accumulated from 2007 to 2016.
Employers, including municipalities, are required to submit a Return of Earnings form on an annual basis in line with the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, No 130 of 1993.
The Act provides for compensation for disablement caused by occupational injuries or diseases sustained or contracted by employees in the course of their employment, or for death resulting from such injuries or diseases.
“The municipal administration is already in discussion with the Department to arrange for payment of the outstanding amount.
“Our first priority is to ensure that staff are covered, as we are not prepared to gamble with the lives of our employees or the money of our ratepayers.”
The Mayor said an investigation was underway to determine why the municipal administration had failed to disclose the outstanding monies to Council.
Executive Mayor Elza van Lingen said the outstanding monies were for Return of Earnings (RoEs), required for what is commonly known as “workmen’s compensation” and payable annually by the municipality to the Compensation Commissioner at the Department of Labour.
“The Council recently made the shocking discovery that the municipality hasn’t been submitting its Return of Earnings to the Compensation Commissioner since 2007.
“This means that municipal employees have not had proper cover for Injury on Duty claims for the past ten years, putting not only staff but Council at substantial risk.”
She said the municipality owed the Department of Labour a total of R12,619 million, accumulated from 2007 to 2016.
Employers, including municipalities, are required to submit a Return of Earnings form on an annual basis in line with the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act, No 130 of 1993.
The Act provides for compensation for disablement caused by occupational injuries or diseases sustained or contracted by employees in the course of their employment, or for death resulting from such injuries or diseases.
“The municipal administration is already in discussion with the Department to arrange for payment of the outstanding amount.
“Our first priority is to ensure that staff are covered, as we are not prepared to gamble with the lives of our employees or the money of our ratepayers.”
The Mayor said an investigation was underway to determine why the municipal administration had failed to disclose the outstanding monies to Council.
Press Release
Laura-Leigh Randall
Kouga Municipality
Media Liaison Officer
084 2055 388
Laura-Leigh Randall
Kouga Municipality
Media Liaison Officer
084 2055 388
Some form of SRA seems inevitable if we want to save St Francis.
thats your opinion ! and just because your the leading writer/only writer, do not push your bias view thru every article written.
Only intended as a comment not as for or against. With the R46 million for the water bill inherited from the ANC council and now another R13 million for labour fees it just doesn’t seem likely that there will be any money left for St Francis infrastructure.
If the municipal employees have not had proper cover for Injury on Duty claims for the past ten years, why does this have to be back dated? Surely no cover no pay must apply.
Very good point Denys!
I wonder if the Employees, Manager and Director, who were responsible for this, are still working there.